SPONSORED LINKS
 
 
Google
 
COMPARISON OF ISDN, ATM AND FRAME RELAY
Integrated services of voice, data, teleconferencing and other applications are receiving wider attention and acceptance with the data and digital communications counimunity. The growth of the Internet is one area in which integrated services are in demand. Transporting text, graphics and multimedia data across the "Net" efficiently has become a big concern for network designers. ISDN is supplying one method for accessing the Internet and delivering these integrated services. For applications that require higher data transfers or larger bandwidth allocations, a second form of ISDN, known as broadband ISDN or BISDN, is being made available.

The original specification is being renamed N-ISDN which stands for narrowband ISDN Within internal inter-networks, routing protocols, ATM, and frame relay continue the job of routing these services through networks to their destination user. ATM is a cell based service that encapsulates packet data into fixed units known as cells and transports them across numerous networks. Frame relay contrasts with ATM in the use of variable size frames to handle the traffic across the networks. Table 8.1 shows a comparison of routing protocols for ISDN, ATM and frame relay.

 

Table 8.1

Protocol Comparisons

Parameter

ISDN

ATM

Frame relay

Bandwidth

64-128 Kbps

1.544 Mbps

64 Kbps-1.544 Mbps

 

BRI

 

 

 

1.544 Mbps

 

 

 

2.048 Mbps

 

 

 

PRI

 

 

Type

Packet/circuit switch

Cell switch

Packet-switched frames.

Features

Integrated services:

Integrated services;

Variable packets;

 

secure, reliable,

QoS, reliable secure,

bandwidth on demand;

 

bursty traffic

all types of traffic.

point-to-point connectivity.

Weak points

Variable tariff rate;

Lack of standards.

Expensive; requires

 

difficult to install

 

dedicated lines;

 

and configure

 

complicated to make

 

 

 

moves and changes.

BACK

SPONSORED LINKS